SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to GiveWP

Other Nonprofit fundraising vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that GiveWP does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from GiveWP on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

GiveWP has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and GiveWP does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and GiveWP does notGiveWP publishes, and they do not
Handbidhandbid.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Virtuousvirtuous.org 48/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Beaconbeaconcrm.org 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Blackbaudblackbaud.com 39/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Bloomerangbloomerang.co 43/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Keelakeela.co 30/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Wikandowikando.de 10/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Funraisefunraise.org 39/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
GoFundMe Proclassy.org 35/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
DonorPerfectdonorperfect.com 32/100 1 Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Donorboxdonorbox.org 30/100 1 Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
GRÜN Softwaregruen.net 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.