Transparency alternatives to W Energy
Other Oil and gas production vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that W Energy does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from W Energy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
W Energy has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and W Energy does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and W Energy does not | W Energy publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mi4mi4.com | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Combocurvecombocurve.com | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| SLB Delfislb.com | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Pelotonpeloton.com | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Quorum Softwarequorumsoftware.com | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Enverusenverus.com | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Ambyintambyint.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Barreleyebarreleyesoftware.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Corvacorva.ai | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Detechtiondetechtion.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| iLandManilandman.com | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Katalystkatalystdm.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.