SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Slides

Other Presentation software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Slides. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

11 shown of 11 that differ from Slides on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Slides has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Slides” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SlidesFound at Slides, not found there
AhaSlidesahaslides.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AhaSlides 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Vismevisme.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Visme 41/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Presentations.AIpresentations.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Presentations.AI 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
MagicSlidesmagicslides.appSee also Transparency alternatives to MagicSlides 22/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Plusplusai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plus 22/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Haiku Deckhaikudeck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Haiku Deck 35/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Chroniclechroniclehq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronicle 17/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Decktopusdecktopus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Decktopus 17/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Sendstepssendsteps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendsteps 17/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Storydocstorydoc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storydoc 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
SlidesAIslidesai.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to SlidesAI 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.