SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Semarchy

Other Product information management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Semarchy does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Semarchy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Semarchy has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Semarchy does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Semarchy does notSemarchy publishes, and they do not
Alationalation.com 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Ataccamaataccama.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Akeneoakeneo.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
data.worlddata.world 39/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Sales Layersaleslayer.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Feedbirdfeedbird.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Reltioreltio.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Castorcastordoc.com 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
GoDataFeedgodatafeed.com 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing nothing Compare
ATAMYAeggheads.net 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Atlanatlan.com 26/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Bluestone PIMbluestonepim.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.