SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to RecordPoint

Other Records management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that RecordPoint does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 16 that differ from RecordPoint on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

RecordPoint has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and RecordPoint does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and RecordPoint does notRecordPoint publishes, and they do not
Objective ECMobjective.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Public pricing Compare
AvePoint Recordsavepoint.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Square 9square-9.com 9/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Collabwarecollabware.com 22/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Synergis Adeptsynergissoftware.com 22/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Feithfeith.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Ricoh Recordsricoh.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Gimmalgimmal.com 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Webrecorder Browsertrixwebrecorder.net 4/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Access Corpaccesscorp.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare
Computhinkcomputhink.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cott Systemscottsystems.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.