Alternatives to Blog2Social
Other Social media management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Blog2Social does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Blog2Social on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Blog2Social has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Blog2Social does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Blog2Social does not | Blog2Social publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hootsuitehootsuite.com | 80/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sprout Socialsproutsocial.com | 80/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Dash Socialdashsocial.com | 75/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Statusbrewstatusbrew.com | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vista Socialvistasocial.com | 55/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Agorapulseagorapulse.com | 50/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Publerpubler.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sprinklrsprinklr.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ContentStudiocontentstudio.io | 50/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Bufferbuffer.com | 45/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| CoSchedulecoschedule.com | 45/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Planableplanable.io | 45/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.