SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Binadox

Other Telecom and SaaS expense management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Binadox does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Binadox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Binadox has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Binadox does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Binadox does notBinadox publishes, and they do not
Spendbasespendbase.co 64/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Augmenttaugmentt.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Obsidianobsidiansecurity.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Valencevalencesecurity.com 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Flexeraflexera.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Public pricing Compare
Tropictropicapp.io 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Calerocalero.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Cocuscocus.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Recoreco.ai 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Axiansaxians.de 22/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Sakonsakon.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Tangoetangoe.com 9/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.