SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to CoVet

Other Veterinary practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CoVet does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from CoVet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CoVet has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and CoVet does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and CoVet does notCoVet publishes, and they do not
Weavegetweave.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Provet Cloudprovet.cloud 41/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
ezyVetezyvet.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Vetstoriavetstoria.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
IDEXXidexx.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
PetDeskpetdesk.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
NaVetornavetor.com 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
Vetspirevetspire.com 26/100 1 Status page with history 1 Certifications named Compare
Vet Radarvetradar.com 22/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Vetcovevetcove.com 18/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Shepherdshepherd.vet 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Talkatootalkatoo.com 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.