Transparency alternatives to Videobolt
Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Videobolt does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 50 that differ from Videobolt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Videobolt has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Videobolt does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Videobolt does not | Videobolt publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WeVideowevideo.com | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Loomloom.com | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Simplecastsimplecast.com | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| api.videoapi.video | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| JWXjwx.com | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vidyardvidyard.com | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Muxmux.com | 52/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vimeovimeo.com | 43/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Tellatella.tv | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Transistortransistor.fm | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Dacastdacast.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Movingimagemovingimage.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.