Alternatives to Invicti
Other Vulnerability management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Invicti does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from Invicti on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Invicti has 2 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Invicti does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Invicti does not | Invicti publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snyksnyk.io | 61/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Wizwiz.io | 57/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Holm Securityholmsecurity.com | 52/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Mendmend.io | 50/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Semgrepsemgrep.dev | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Aqua Securityaquasec.com | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| StackHawkstackhawk.com | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Nucleus Securitynucleussec.com | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Tenabletenable.com | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Black Duckblackduck.com | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | Compare |
| Intruderintruder.io | 57/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| SonarSourcesonarsource.com | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.