Transparency alternatives to Invicti
Other Vulnerability management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Invicti. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Invicti on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Invicti has 2 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Invicti” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Invicti | Found at Invicti, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapid7rapid7.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rapid7 | 70/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Snyksnyk.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Snyk | 61/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Holm Securityholmsecurity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Holm Security | 52/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Sucurisucuri.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Sucuri | 52/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Semgrepsemgrep.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Semgrep | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Veracodeveracode.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veracode | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Wizwiz.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Wiz | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Aqua Securityaquasec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aqua Security | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| StackHawkstackhawk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to StackHawk | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Mendmend.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Mend | 36/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Probelyprobely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Probely | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Nucleus Securitynucleussec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nucleus Security | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.