SaaS Ranking
Menu

Invicti: what they publish

invicti.com · Vulnerability management · checked 2026-10-17

83/100BBand B

Rank 1 of 41 in Vulnerability management, where the median is 26.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-17. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

2 days since the newest dated result, 2 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Invicti

invicti.com · Vulnerability management

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
B 83of 100 Rank 1 of 41

Published commitments8 of 9 found

Measured behaviour2 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-17. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Invicti has no such document.

Where Invicti sits in Vulnerability management

  1. A0 0%
  2. B2 5%
  3. C2 5%
  4. D9 22%
  5. E9 22%
  6. F19 46%
41 vendors with a score; 2 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Invicti is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Invicti states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.invicti.com/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://invicti.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://invicti.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in Vulnerability management: 16 of 42 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-17.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://invicti.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: 923-hqb-396.mktoresp.com, a.usbrowserspeed.com, ad.doubleclick.net, api.usergems.com, app-ab50.marketo.com, b.6sc.co, bat.bing.com, bat.bing.net, c.6sc.co, cdn.bizible.com, cdn.bizibly.com, cdn.jsdelivr.net, cdn.neverbounce.com, cdn.prod.website-files.com, d3e54v103j8qbb.cloudfront.net, epsilon.6sense.com, googleads.g.doubleclick.net, ipv6.6sc.co, j.6sc.co, js.zi-scripts.com, marketo.use1-marketplace-1p-apps-prod-red.if.webflow.services, munchkin.marketo.net, px.ads.linkedin.com, region1.analytics.google.com, secure.adnxs.com, snap.licdn.com, static.hotjar.com, static.oktopost.com, stats.g.doubleclick.net, t.influ2.com, ug-webapp-public-production.s3.amazonaws.com, ws-assets.zoominfo.com, ws.zoominfo.com, www.google.com, www.google.de, www.googleadservices.com, www.googletagmanager.com, www.influ2.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Vulnerability management: 0 of 42 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 10
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://www.invicti.com/legal/dpa · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Vulnerability management: 8 of 41 companies

✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://www.invicti.com/legal/subprocessors · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Vulnerability management: 9 of 41 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording United States. This does not establish the company’s headquarters.
    Show the exact wording

    We are headquartered in the United States, and personal information is transferred to, stored in, and processed in the United States as well as other countries in which we or our affiliates, partners,...

    Read at https://www.invicti.com/compliance/privacy-policy

Source: https://www.invicti.com/compliance/privacy-policy · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Data location stated in Vulnerability management: 8 of 41 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://www.invicti.com/pricing · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Public pricing in Vulnerability management: 16 of 41 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Read at https://invicti.com/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains.
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Read at https://invicti.com/

Source: https://invicti.com/ · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Vulnerability management: 35 of 42 companies

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

Source: https://www.invicti.com/legal/dpa · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Vulnerability management: 6 of 41 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    View our Report ISO 27001:2025 Our Information Security Management Systems meet international security standards in data prot

    Read at https://www.invicti.com/compliance

    Enterprise Compliance SOC 2 Type 2 Our SOC 2 Type 2 report validates internal controls and systems related to security availabi

    Read at https://www.invicti.com/compliance

Source: https://www.invicti.com/compliance · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Certifications named in Vulnerability management: 25 of 41 companies

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 99.5 %.
    Show the exact wording

    The Cloud Service will be available for Customer to access via the Invicti provided user interface 99.5% of the time in any calendar month, excluding Excluded Downtime.

    Read at https://www.invicti.com/legal/sla

Source: https://www.invicti.com/legal/sla · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Vulnerability management: 2 of 40 companies

✓

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

Source: https://www.invicti.com/.well-known/security.txt · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Vulnerability management: 17 of 39 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://www.invicti.com/compliance/privacy-policy · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Vulnerability management: 18 of 41 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-10: 83 of 1002026-10-17: 83 of 100 2026-10-10 2026-10-17
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Invicti in: 83 (2026-10-10), 83 (2026-10-17).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Invicti

10 found · 2 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-17.

Investigate 2 open evidence questions
  1. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  2. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.