SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to IONOS

Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that IONOS does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from IONOS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

IONOS has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and IONOS does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and IONOS does notIONOS publishes, and they do not
Glideglideapps.com 80/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Ghostghost.org 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Hostingerhostinger.com 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Squarespacesquarespace.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history nothing Compare
Framerframer.com 60/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named nothing Compare
Softrsoftr.io 55/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Wixwix.com 30/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Webflowwebflow.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Adaloadalo.com 45/100 1 Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Tildatilda.cc 42/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Typedreamtypedream.com 40/100 1 Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Umsoumso.com 40/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.