Transparency alternatives to Managry Current Timesheets
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Managry Current Timesheets does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 84 that differ from Managry Current Timesheets on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Managry Current Timesheets has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Managry Current Timesheets does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Managry Current Timesheets does not | Managry Current Timesheets publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.com | 70/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.com | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.com | 57/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.com | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.com | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.com | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.com | 39/100 | 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Clockodoclockodo.com | 30/100 | 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Findmyshiftfindmyshift.com | 45/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.