Transparency alternatives to Synerion
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Synerion does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 84 that differ from Synerion on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Synerion has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Synerion does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Synerion does not | Synerion publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.com | 70/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.com | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.com | 57/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.com | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.com | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.com | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| When I Workwheniwork.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Findmyshiftfindmyshift.com | 45/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.