SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to TimeTac

Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that TimeTac does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 82 that differ from TimeTac on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

TimeTac has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and TimeTac does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and TimeTac does notTimeTac publishes, and they do not
Timelytimelyapp.com 65/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Agendrixagendrix.com 70/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
7shifts7shifts.com 57/100 4 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
actiTIMEactitime.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Deputydeputy.com 48/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
TimeCamptimecamp.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
RotaCloudrotacloud.com 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Time Doctortimedoctor.com 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Beebolebeebole.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Hubstaffhubstaff.com 39/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Sonagetsona.com 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Clockodoclockodo.com 30/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.