SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Slate

Other API management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Slate does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 45 that differ from Slate on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Slate has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Slate does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Slate does notSlate publishes, and they do not
Redoclyredocly.com 65/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +5 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Svixsvix.com 65/100 8 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Moesifmoesif.com 65/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Postmanpostman.com 57/100 7 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Hookdeckhookdeck.com 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Theneotheneo.io 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Bump.shbump.sh 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Graviteegravitee.io 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Fernbuildwithfern.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
ReadMereadme.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Apollo GraphQLapollographql.com 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Hasurahasura.io 35/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.