Transparency alternatives to Unified.to
Other API management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Unified.to does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 45 that differ from Unified.to on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Unified.to has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Unified.to does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Unified.to does not | Unified.to publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Svixsvix.com | 74/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Redoclyredocly.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Moesifmoesif.com | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Hookdeckhookdeck.com | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Postmanpostman.com | 57/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Traefiktraefik.io | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Apollo GraphQLapollographql.com | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Speakeasyspeakeasy.com | 30/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Theneotheneo.io | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Bump.shbump.sh | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Graviteegravitee.io | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ReadMereadme.com | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.