SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Ghost Security

Other API security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ghost Security does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 15 that differ from Ghost Security on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Ghost Security has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Ghost Security does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Ghost Security does notGhost Security publishes, and they do not
42Crunch42crunch.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
APIsecapisec.ai 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Salt Securitysalt.security 35/100 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Pyntpynt.io 30/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
FireTailfiretail.ai 26/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Beagle Securitybeaglesecurity.com 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Cequencecequence.ai 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
ThreatXthreatx.com 22/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Aptoriaptori.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Corshacorsha.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Levo.ailevo.ai 22/100 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Approovapproov.io 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.