Transparency alternatives to Reblaze
Other API security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Reblaze does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 20 that differ from Reblaze on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Reblaze has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Reblaze does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Reblaze does not | Reblaze publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salt Securitysalt.security | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cequencecequence.ai | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Pyntpynt.io | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| FireTailfiretail.ai | 26/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| PortSwiggerportswigger.net | 26/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Beagle Securitybeaglesecurity.com | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ThreatXthreatx.com | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Levo.ailevo.ai | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| 42Crunch42crunch.com | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| APIsecapisec.ai | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Approovapproov.io | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Data Theoremdatatheorem.com | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.