Transparency alternatives to Recruit So Simple
Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Recruit So Simple does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Recruit So Simple on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Recruit So Simple has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Recruit So Simple does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Recruit So Simple does not | Recruit So Simple publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jobvitejobvite.com | 83/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| JazzHRjazzhr.com | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Workableworkable.com | 61/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| SmartRecruiterssmartrecruiters.com | 57/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Bullhornbullhorn.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| PrimePROprimepro.net | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Leverlever.co | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| iCIMSicims.com | 39/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Homerunhomerun.co | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Manatalmanatal.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Joinjoin.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Ashbyashbyhq.com | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.