SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Worklis

Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Worklis does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 41 that differ from Worklis on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Worklis has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Worklis does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Worklis does notWorklis publishes, and they do not
Jobvitejobvite.com 83/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
JazzHRjazzhr.com 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Workableworkable.com 61/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
SmartRecruiterssmartrecruiters.com 57/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Bullhornbullhorn.com 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
PrimePROprimepro.net 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Leverlever.co 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
iCIMSicims.com 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Greenhousegreenhouse.io 22/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Homerunhomerun.co 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Manatalmanatal.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Joinjoin.com 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.