Alternatives to Alloy Automation
Other Workflow automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Alloy Automation does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Alloy Automation on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Alloy Automation has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Alloy Automation does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Alloy Automation does not | Alloy Automation publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapierzapier.com | 85/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Tallyfytallyfy.com | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Tray.aitray.ai | 75/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| n8nn8n.io | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Mergemerge.dev | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Boomiboomi.com | 52/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Process Streetprocess.st | 50/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Prismaticprismatic.io | 43/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Automation Anywhereautomationanywhere.com | 45/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Celigoceligo.com | 45/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| IFTTTifttt.com | 45/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Kissflowkissflow.com | 45/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.