Workflow automation vendors, ranked by transparency
Workflow automation and integration platforms, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.
- 30Vendors
- 28Ranked
- 12Criteria each
- 2026-08-31Checked
| # | Vendor | Score | DPA | Subproc. | Region | Status | Pricing | Certs | SLA | HSTS | Consent | sec.txt | Notice | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zapier | 85 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 2 | Tray.ai | 75 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 3 | Boomi | 70 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 4 | Merge | 65 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 5 | n8n | 65 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 6 | Tallyfy | 65 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 7 | Pipefy | 58 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | – | – | – |
| 8 | Process Street | 50 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 9 | Automation Anywhere | 45 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 10 | Celigo | 45 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 11 | IFTTT | 45 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 12 | Kissflow | 45 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 13 | Pabbly | 45 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 14 | Prismatic | 45 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 15 | Bardeen | 40 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 16 | Nango | 40 | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 17 | Activepieces | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 18 | Alloy Automation | 35 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 19 | Camunda | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 20 | Cyclr | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 21 | Paragon | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 22 | Workato | 35 | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 23 | Pipedream | 30 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 24 | Jitterbit | 25 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 25 | Nintex | 25 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 26 | UiPath | 20 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | – | – |
| 27 | SnapLogic | 15 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 28 | Integrately | 10 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| Make | not enough data | – | – | – | ✓ | – | – | – | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – | |
| MuleSoft | not enough data | – | – | – | ✗ | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | – |
This category, criterion by criterion
How this market does on each criterion, with its own share and how it compares with the rest.
Data processing agreement · Subprocessor list · Data location stated · Status page with history · Public pricing · Certifications named · Uptime SLA with a figure · HTTPS enforced with HSTS · No third-party tracking before consent · security.txt (RFC 9116)
Every result links its source on the vendor page. A dash means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.