Transparency alternatives to Pokee AI
Other Workflow automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pokee AI does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Pokee AI on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pokee AI has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Pokee AI does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Pokee AI does not | Pokee AI publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zapierzapier.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Tray.aitray.ai | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Pipefypipefy.com | 59/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Mergemerge.dev | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Automation Anywhereautomationanywhere.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Boomiboomi.com | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Kissflowkissflow.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Celigoceligo.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Trigger.devtrigger.dev | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Tallyfytallyfy.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| n8nn8n.io | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Knitgetknit.dev | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.