Transparency alternatives to Swiss Aviation
Other Aviation maintenance software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Swiss Aviation. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from Swiss Aviation on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Swiss Aviation has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Swiss Aviation” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Swiss Aviation | Found at Swiss Aviation, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Web Manualswebmanuals.aeroSee also Transparency alternatives to Web Manuals | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Fl3xxfl3xx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fl3xx | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Foreflightforeflight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foreflight | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Skylegsskylegs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Skylegs | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Camp Systemscampsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Camp Systems | 22/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Leon Softwareleonsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leon Software | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Veryonveryon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veryon | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| AeroSightaero-sight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AeroSight | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Comply365comply365.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Comply365 | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Lidolhsystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lido | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Aviation Intertecaviationintertec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aviation Intertec | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| BARTbart.aeroSee also Transparency alternatives to BART | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.