Transparency alternatives to SafeBytes Cloud Backup
Other Backup and recovery vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that SafeBytes Cloud Backup does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from SafeBytes Cloud Backup on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
SafeBytes Cloud Backup has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and SafeBytes Cloud Backup does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and SafeBytes Cloud Backup does not | SafeBytes Cloud Backup publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rewindrewind.com | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SimpleBackupssimplebackups.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Afiafi.ai | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SpinOnespin.ai | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| BorgBaseborgbase.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Barracudabarracuda.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Keepitkeepit.com | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Acronisacronis.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cohesitycohesity.com | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Redstorredstor.com | 32/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Comet Backupcometbackup.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SysCloudsyscloud.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.