SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to EMR Systems

Other Behavioral health vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that EMR Systems does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 12 that differ from EMR Systems on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

EMR Systems has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and EMR Systems does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and EMR Systems does notEMR Systems publishes, and they do not
BehaveHealthbehavehealth.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
AZZLYazzly.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Blueprintblueprint.ai 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
BestNotesbestnotes.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Ensora Healthensorahealth.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Footholdfootholdtechnology.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Opus EHRopusehr.com 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
CarePathscarepaths.com 9/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Lightning Steplightningstep.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Mirahmirah.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Rittenritten.io 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
MHSmhs.com 4/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.