Transparency alternatives to Ensora Health
Other Behavioral health vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ensora Health. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Ensora Health on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ensora Health has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Ensora Health” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Ensora Health | Found at Ensora Health, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZZLYazzly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AZZLY | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Blueprintblueprint.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Blueprint | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| BehaveHealthbehavehealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BehaveHealth | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Kipu Healthkipuhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kipu Health | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Valantvalant.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Valant | 14/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Footholdfootholdtechnology.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foothold | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Welligentwelligent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Welligent | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Opus EHRopusehr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Opus EHR | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| eHana EHRehana.comSee also Transparency alternatives to eHana EHR | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Lightning Steplightningstep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lightning Step | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Mirahmirah.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mirah | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Qualifactsqualifacts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qualifacts | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.