SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to BehaveHealth

Other Behavioral health vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at BehaveHealth. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from BehaveHealth on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

BehaveHealth has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at BehaveHealth” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at BehaveHealthFound at BehaveHealth, not found there
AZZLYazzly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AZZLY 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Blueprintblueprint.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Blueprint 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Kipu Healthkipuhealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kipu Health 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Footholdfootholdtechnology.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foothold 26/100 1 Public pricing 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Welligentwelligent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Welligent 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
BestNotesbestnotes.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BestNotes 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Ensora Healthensorahealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ensora Health 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Opus EHRopusehr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Opus EHR 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Practice Fusionpracticefusion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Practice Fusion 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Valantvalant.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Valant 14/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
CarePathscarepaths.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CarePaths 9/100 1 Public pricing 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
MHSmhs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MHS 4/100 1 Certifications named 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.