SaaS transparency ranking · Security and compliance
Business continuity vendors, ranked by what they publish
Business continuity planning, crisis management and operational resilience software, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.
5 vendors measured on their own sites, last on 2026-09-02. 4 ranked, 1 without enough data for a score. A vendor we could not measure often enough gets no rank at all, rather than a bad one.
Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Transparency means: published on the vendor's own site, readable without a login, found by us at the addresses we checked.
- Business continuity11
- All categories26
5 vendors
Sort by Score Name Last checked
Filters (0)
- ✓ found, source linked
- × not found at the addresses we checked
- – not measured by us
- 12 criteria in the order of the methodology, heaviest first within each group.
-
1
Rockdoverockdovesolutions.comTransparency 16/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not measured
- Notice before subprocessors change: not measured
- Named privacy contact: not measured
Gap: Data processing agreement and 6 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 16/100 = weight of what we found (3) divided by weight of what we could measure (19). Rank 1 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 2 criteria: No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Certifications named ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 7 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1.
Not measured by us, 3 criteria: Notice before subprocessors change ×2, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
2
Cammscammsgroup.comTransparency 13/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 10 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 13/100 = weight of what we found (3) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 2 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 1 criterion: Data location stated ×3.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 11 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
3
Continuity2continuity2.comTransparency 9/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 10 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 9/100 = weight of what we found (2) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 3 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Found with a source, 1 criterion: HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 11 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
4
Bryghtpathbryghtpath.comTransparency 0/100 FBand F
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not found
- Public pricing: not found
- Certifications named: not found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not found
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: not found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not found
- Named privacy contact: not found
Gap: Data processing agreement and 11 moreWhy this rank?
Transparency 0/100 = weight of what we found (0) divided by weight of what we could measure (23). Rank 4 in this category by that score; ties are broken by name.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 12 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Certifications named ×1, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
-
Fusion Risk Managementfusionrm.comNot enough data: 7 of 12 criteria measured, so no transparency score
- Data processing agreement: not found
- Subprocessor list: not found
- Data location stated: not found
- Status page with history: not measured
- Public pricing: not measured
- Certifications named: found
- Uptime SLA with a figure: not measured
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS: found
- No third-party tracking before consent: not found
- security.txt (RFC 9116): not found
- Notice before subprocessors change: not measured
- Named privacy contact: not measured
Gap: Data processing agreement and 4 moreWhy this rank?
No score: we could measure 7 of 12 criteria, and below 9 there is no number and no rank. That is a statement about our measurement, not about the vendor.
Found with a source, 2 criteria: HTTPS enforced with HSTS ×2, Certifications named ×1.
Not found at the addresses we checked, 5 criteria: Data processing agreement ×3, Subprocessor list ×3, Data location stated ×3, No third-party tracking before consent ×2, security.txt (RFC 9116) ×1.
Not measured by us, 5 criteria: Status page with history ×2, Public pricing ×2, Notice before subprocessors change ×2, Uptime SLA with a figure ×1, Named privacy contact ×1.
Every source and every checked address is on the vendor page.
Tick two vendors above.
Every result links its source on the vendor page. A dash means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.