Transparency alternatives to Fusion Risk Management
Other Business continuity vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Fusion Risk Management. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 19 that differ from Fusion Risk Management on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fusion Risk Management has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Fusion Risk Management” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Fusion Risk Management | Found at Fusion Risk Management, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cutovercutover.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cutover | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Databarracksdatabarracks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Databarracks | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Origami Riskorigamirisk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Origami Risk | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Rockdoverockdovesolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rockdove | 16/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Protechtprotechtgroup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Protecht | 14/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| KingsBridgekingsbridgebcp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to KingsBridge | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Preparispreparis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Preparis | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Cammscammsgroup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Camms | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Ncontractsncontracts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ncontracts | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Crises Controlcrises-control.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crises Control | 11/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Continuity2continuity2.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Continuity2 | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Crisis24crisis24.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crisis24 | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.