Transparency alternatives to ancoreShare
Other Business intelligence vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ancoreShare does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from ancoreShare on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ancoreShare has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ancoreShare does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ancoreShare does not | ancoreShare publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Countcount.co | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cluviocluvio.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Klipfolioklipfolio.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Databoxdatabox.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sisensesisense.com | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| ThoughtSpotthoughtspot.com | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Jettijetti.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Hexhex.tech | 35/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Steepsteep.app | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Lightdashlightdash.com | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Deepnotedeepnote.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Lookerlooker.com | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.