SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Explo

Other Business intelligence vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Explo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Explo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Explo has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Explo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Explo does notExplo publishes, and they do not
ThoughtSpotthoughtspot.com 57/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Klipfolioklipfolio.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cluviocluvio.com 55/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Databoxdatabox.com 55/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Lightdashlightdash.com 60/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Deepnotedeepnote.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
GoodDatagooddata.com 35/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Hexhex.tech 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Lookerlooker.com 35/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Status page with history Compare
Presetpreset.io 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Luzmoluzmo.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Sisensesisense.com 40/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.