SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to BLAZE

Other Cannabis retail and compliance vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at BLAZE. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 30 that differ from BLAZE on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

BLAZE has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at BLAZE” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at BLAZEFound at BLAZE, not found there
Flowhubflowhub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flowhub 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Weedmapsweedmaps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weedmaps 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Greenlinegetgreenline.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Greenline 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
BakedBotbakedbot.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to BakedBot 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
LeafLinkleaflink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LeafLink 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
POSaBITposabit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to POSaBIT 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Trymtrym.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Trym 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
AIQaiq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AIQ 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Canixcanix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Canix 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Confident LIMSconfidentlims.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Confident LIMS 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
GrowFlowgrowflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GrowFlow 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Meadowgetmeadow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meadow 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.