SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to BakedBot

Other Cannabis retail and compliance vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at BakedBot. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from BakedBot on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

BakedBot has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at BakedBot” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at BakedBotFound at BakedBot, not found there
Flowhubflowhub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flowhub 39/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Weedmapsweedmaps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weedmaps 35/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Covacovasoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cova 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Greenlinegetgreenline.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Greenline 26/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
IndicaOnlineindicaonline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IndicaOnline 26/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
LeafLinkleaflink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LeafLink 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Trymtrym.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Trym 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
BLAZEblaze.meSee also Transparency alternatives to BLAZE 9/100 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Distrudistru.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Distru 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
POSaBITposabit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to POSaBIT 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
AIQaiq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AIQ 17/100 1 Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Canixcanix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Canix 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.