SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Coastr

Other Car rental and fleet sharing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Coastr does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Coastr on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Coastr has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Coastr does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Coastr does notCoastr publishes, and they do not
Catch-ecatch-e.com.au 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Rentwarerentware.io 36/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Wunder Mobilitywundermobility.com 30/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Finnfinn.com 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Vulogvulog.com 13/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Snappcarsnappcar.de 9/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Milesmiles-mobility.com 22/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Moqomoqo.de 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 Public pricing Compare
Inversinvers.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Getaroundgetaround.com 14/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Easyrentproeasyrentpro.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Ridecellridecell.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.