Transparency alternatives to Wunder Mobility
Other Car rental and fleet sharing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Wunder Mobility. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from Wunder Mobility on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Wunder Mobility has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Wunder Mobility” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Wunder Mobility | Found at Wunder Mobility, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catch-ecatch-e.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Catch-e | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Inversinvers.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Invers | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rentwarerentware.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Rentware | 36/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Moqomoqo.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Moqo | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Finnfinn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Finn | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Snappcarsnappcar.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Snappcar | 9/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Milesmiles-mobility.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Miles | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Coastrcoastr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Coastr | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TopRentApptoprentapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TopRentApp | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Wheelbasewheelbasepro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wheelbase | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Getaroundgetaround.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Getaround | 14/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Easyrentproeasyrentpro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easyrentpro | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.