SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Roadsurfer

Other Car rental and fleet sharing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Roadsurfer does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 15 that differ from Roadsurfer on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Roadsurfer has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Roadsurfer does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Roadsurfer does notRoadsurfer publishes, and they do not
Wunder Mobilitywundermobility.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Milesmiles-mobility.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Easyrentproeasyrentpro.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Finnfinn.com 17/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Moqomoqo.de 22/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Inversinvers.com 17/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Getaroundgetaround.com 14/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ridecellridecell.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Carlacarla.com 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Paulcamperpaulcamper.de 9/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Cargomondocargomondo.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Faarenfaaren.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.