Transparency alternatives to Church Social
Other Church and community management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Church Social. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Church Social on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Church Social has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Church Social” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Church Social | Found at Church Social, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planning Centerplanningcenter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planning Center | 57/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Text In Churchtextinchurch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Text In Church | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ChurchWiseAIchurchwiseai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ChurchWiseAI | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Servant Keeperservantkeeper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Servant Keeper | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CHMeetingschmeetings.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CHMeetings | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Multitracksmultitracks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Multitracks | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Subsplashsubsplash.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Subsplash | 32/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Bible Appyouversion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bible App | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Tithe.lytithe.lySee also Transparency alternatives to Tithe.ly | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Breezebreezechms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Breeze | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Churchsuitechurchsuite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Churchsuite | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Faithlifefaithlife.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Faithlife | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.