SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Sharefaith

Other Church and community management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Sharefaith does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 39 that differ from Sharefaith on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Sharefaith has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Sharefaith does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Sharefaith does notSharefaith publishes, and they do not
Planning Centerplanningcenter.com 57/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Text In Churchtextinchurch.com 61/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
ChurchWiseAIchurchwiseai.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Pushpaypushpay.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Multitracksmultitracks.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Servant Keeperservantkeeper.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
CHMeetingschmeetings.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Churchsuitechurchsuite.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Faithlifefaithlife.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Aplosaplos.com 22/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bible Appyouversion.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Breezebreezechms.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.