Transparency alternatives to Clinion
Other Clinical trial software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Clinion. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Clinion on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Clinion has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Clinion” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Clinion | Found at Clinion, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florenceflorencehc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Florence | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| 4G Clinical4gclinical.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 4G Clinical | 30/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| OpenClinicaopenclinica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenClinica | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| TrialKitcrucialdatasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrialKit | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Suvodasuvoda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Suvoda | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Advarraadvarra.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advarra | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Antidoteantidote.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Antidote | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Datatrakdatatrak.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datatrak | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| EnrollNowenrollnow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to EnrollNow | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Threadthreadresearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Thread | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cluepointscluepoints.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cluepoints | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Viedocviedoc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Viedoc | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.