SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to TrialKit

Other Clinical trial software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that TrialKit does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from TrialKit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

TrialKit has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and TrialKit does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and TrialKit does notTrialKit publishes, and they do not
Trialdatatrialdata.de 22/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
4G Clinical4gclinical.com 30/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 Data location stated Compare
OpenClinicaopenclinica.com 30/100 1 Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Suvodasuvoda.com 30/100 1 Subprocessor list 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Florenceflorencehc.com 26/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Cluepointscluepoints.com 22/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Viedocviedoc.com 22/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Wcgclinicalwcgclinical.com 17/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Advarraadvarra.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare
Antidoteantidote.me 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare
Datatrakdatatrak.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare
EnrollNowenrollnow.io 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.