Alternatives to Lightship
Other Clinical trial software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Lightship does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Lightship on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Lightship has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Lightship does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Lightship does not | Lightship publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Florenceflorencehc.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cluepointscluepoints.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| 4G Clinical4gclinical.com | 30/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| OpenClinicaopenclinica.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Phlexglobalphlexglobal.com | 29/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Advarraadvarra.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Antidoteantidote.me | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Curebasecurebase.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| EnrollNowenrollnow.io | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Perceptiveperceptive.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Threadthreadresearch.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Viedocviedoc.com | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.