SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Gcore

Other Cloud hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Gcore does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Gcore on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Gcore has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Gcore does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Gcore does notGcore publishes, and they do not
Exoscaleexoscale.com 87/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
DigitalOceandigitalocean.com 75/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Kinstakinsta.com 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Renderrender.com 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Vercelvercel.com 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Aptibleaptible.com 55/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Fly.iofly.io 55/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Railwayrailway.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Cloudwayscloudways.com 33/100 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cloudflarecloudflare.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated nothing Compare
Netlifynetlify.com 57/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Herokuheroku.com 50/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.