Transparency alternatives to Mega
Other Cloud storage vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mega. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 22 that differ from Mega on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Mega has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Mega” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Mega | Found at Mega, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDriveidrive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDrive | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Proton Driveproton.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Proton Drive | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dropboxdropbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dropbox | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Egnyteegnyte.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Egnyte | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Sync.comsync.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sync.com | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Livedrivelivedrive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Livedrive | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Filenfilen.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Filen | 39/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Koofrkoofr.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Koofr | 35/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| RushFilesrushfiles.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RushFiles | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Backblazebackblaze.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Backblaze | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Jottacloudjottacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jottacloud | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tresorittresorit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tresorit | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.