SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Sync.com

Other Cloud storage vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sync.com. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from Sync.com on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Sync.com has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Sync.com” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Sync.comFound at Sync.com, not found there
IDriveidrive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDrive 61/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Proton Driveproton.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Proton Drive 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Egnyteegnyte.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Egnyte 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Koofrkoofr.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Koofr 35/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Tresorittresorit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tresorit 22/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Dropboxdropbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dropbox 48/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Filenfilen.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Filen 39/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Megamega.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Mega 36/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
ownCloudowncloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ownCloud 35/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Backblazebackblaze.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Backblaze 22/100 1 Data processing agreement 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Jottacloudjottacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jottacloud 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Icedriveicedrive.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Icedrive 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.