SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to eMaint

Other Maintenance management (CMMS) vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that eMaint does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from eMaint on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

eMaint has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and eMaint does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and eMaint does noteMaint publishes, and they do not
Fiixfiixsoftware.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
MaintainXgetmaintainx.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Infraspeakinfraspeak.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Limblelimble.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
ServiceChannelservicechannel.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Accruentaccruent.com 30/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Cryotoscryotos.com 30/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Click Maintclickmaint.com 21/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
eWorkOrderseworkorders.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 Data location stated Compare
Fracttalfracttal.com 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Nuvolonuvolo.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Prometheus Groupprometheusgroup.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.