Transparency alternatives to Fleet Maintenance Pro
Other Maintenance management (CMMS) vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Fleet Maintenance Pro does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from Fleet Maintenance Pro on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fleet Maintenance Pro has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Fleet Maintenance Pro does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Fleet Maintenance Pro does not | Fleet Maintenance Pro publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiixfiixsoftware.com | 35/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| UpKeepupkeep.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Infraspeakinfraspeak.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Limblelimble.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| MaintainXgetmaintainx.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Accruentaccruent.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| ServiceChannelservicechannel.com | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Asset Infinityassetinfinity.com | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Cenoscocenosco.com | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| GEOMAGIC GeoNAMgeomagic.de | 17/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| eMaintemaint.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Mendrhubmendrhub.com | 22/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.