SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Zed

Other Coding assistants vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Zed. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 15 that differ from Zed on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Zed has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Zed” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ZedFound at Zed, not found there
Factoryfactory.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Factory 74/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Cursorcursor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cursor 48/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Kilokilo.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Kilo 48/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Cognitioncognition.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cognition 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Qodoqodo.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Qodo 35/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Poolsidepoolside.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Poolside 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing Compare
Augment Codeaugmentcode.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Augment Code 48/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Magicmagic.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic 39/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Roomoteroomote.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Roomote 35/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Unblockedgetunblocked.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unblocked 30/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
OpenHandsopenhands.devSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenHands 22/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Clinecline.botSee also Transparency alternatives to Cline 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.