Alternatives to Kilo
Other Coding assistants vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Kilo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 15 that differ from Kilo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kilo has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Kilo does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Kilo does not | Kilo publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factoryfactory.ai | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cognitioncognition.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Poolsidepoolside.ai | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Zedzed.dev | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Roomoteroomote.dev | 35/100 | 3 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Augment Codeaugmentcode.com | 48/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Magicmagic.dev | 39/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Cursorcursor.com | 48/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Qodoqodo.ai | 39/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Tabninetabnine.com | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| CodeGPTcodegpt.co | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Traetrae.ai | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.